In the ever-evolving landscape of search engine optimization (SEO), maintaining high-quality content is paramount. Google, the dominant force in search, continuously refines its algorithms and guidelines to ensure users find valuable, relevant information. One of the most impactful consequences for websites failing to meet these standards is the thin content with little or no added value manual action. This penalty can severely impact a site’s visibility, leading to significant drops in search rankings and organic traffic. This comprehensive guide aims to demystify this critical manual action, explaining precisely what is thin content with little or no added value manual action, why Google thin content policies target it, and how it affects an online presence.

Understanding Thin Content: More Than Just Word Count

At its core, thin content refers to web pages that offer minimal or no value to site visitors. It is not merely about the length of the content; rather, it is about its substance, originality, and ability to satisfy a user’s search intent. As Lumar defines it, “Thin content is defined as web pages that provide little or no value to site visitors — whether by not offering enough content, or offering content that doesn’t really satisfy a user’s search intent.”.[1] From Google’s perspective, displaying thin content in search results diminishes the quality of its user experience, which is why it actively seeks to identify and penalize such pages.[2]

The Evolution of Google’s Stance on Content Quality

Google’s focus on content quality is not new. It has evolved significantly over the years, with key algorithmic updates shaping its approach:

• The Panda Update (2011): Introduced in 2011, the Panda algorithm update was a pivotal moment. Its primary objective was to prevent sites with low-quality content from ranking highly. This update specifically targeted duplicate, plagiarized, or thin content, as well as user-generated spam and keyword stuffing.[3] Many websites experienced a google thin content penalty or significant drops in rankings as a result.
• The Fred Update (2017): While more focused on spammy, non-user-friendly advertising practices, the Fred update further reinforced Google’s commitment to combating thin content and strategies that prioritize SEO manipulation over user value.[3]
• The Helpful Content System (2022 onwards): More recently, Google’s Helpful Content Update, launched in 2022 and continuously refined, emphasizes “people-first” content. This system aims to reward content that directly addresses user intent and provides a satisfying experience, while reducing the visibility of unhelpful, low-value content.[4, 5] This shift underscores that content should be created for users, not primarily for search engines.[6]

The Shifting Paradigm of Google’s Content Evaluation

The evolution from the Panda update to the Helpful Content System reveals a clear progression in Google’s approach to content assessment. Initially, the focus was on identifying and penalizing overt spam tactics such as keyword stuffing and blatant content duplication. This represented a foundational effort to clean up the search index by addressing what was clearly manipulative or low-quality. However, as webmasters adapted and found more subtle ways to generate content for search engines rather than users, Google’s systems became more sophisticated. The Helpful Content System now delves deeper, evaluating whether content genuinely satisfies user intent and provides a truly “people-first” experience.[3, 4] This signifies that merely avoiding obvious spam is no longer sufficient; content must offer substantive value and solve user problems to avoid being classified as thin content google.

A significant implication of this evolution is the holistic site-wide impact of content quality. The Helpful Content System’s classifier can determine if a website has a high proportion of unhelpful content, and if so, it can affect the ranking of the entire site, even if some pages are otherwise high-quality.[4] This demonstrates that Google is increasingly assessing the overall quality and purpose of a domain, rather than just individual pages, when determining its value to users. This comprehensive evaluation means that a thin content with little or no added value manual action, while specific, is part of a broader ecosystem of quality control that can affect a site’s overall organic performance and visibility. It also creates a strong incentive for webmasters to conduct thorough content audits and either improve or remove all low-value content across their site, rather than just focusing on top-performing pages.

The Hallmarks of Thin Content: What Google Identifies

Google’s Webmaster Quality Guidelines (now known as Google Search Essentials) provide clear examples of what constitutes thin content. These categories often overlap, but all share the common trait of offering little to no unique value to the user.[3, 7]

This table is valuable because it systematically categorizes and exemplifies the various forms of thin content, providing a clear reference for website owners to identify potential issues on their own sites. It directly addresses the “what is thin content” aspect of the query with actionable detail.

Nuances in Content Quality and Manipulation

When analyzing the characteristics of thin content, it becomes clear that Google’s manual actions are often triggered by the intent behind the “thinness.” While some instances of thin content, such as an e-commerce site reusing manufacturer product descriptions across many pages, might occur unintentionally, the thin content with little or no added value manual action is primarily a response to content created with the deliberate aim of manipulating search rankings.[8, 19, 20] This distinction is critical: accidental duplication might lead to algorithmic de-ranking, but intentional, scaled manipulation is what typically prompts a human reviewer’s intervention. Google’s human reviewers are specifically deployed when automated systems detect patterns indicative of deliberate attempts to game the search index. The “little or no added value” then becomes a symptom of this underlying manipulative intent, rather than the sole cause of the manual action. Therefore, webmasters must not only focus on the superficial aspects of content (e.g., word count) but also critically examine the strategic purpose behind their content creation. If the fundamental objective is to circumvent search guidelines rather than to serve users, the risk of a thin content manual action increases significantly.

Furthermore, the scope of “content” that Google evaluates extends beyond just written text. It encompasses images, videos, and other multimedia elements. However, the value of these non-textual elements is also rigorously scrutinized. For instance, merely embedding media from other sources without adding original insights, unique commentary, or contextual explanations can be considered thin content.[3, 16] This comprehensive view of content highlights that Google’s algorithms are designed to understand the overall user experience provided by a page. If multimedia is used simply as filler or copied without unique value, it contributes to a low-quality experience, signaling thinness. This means content creators must apply the “added value” principle to every component on their page. A visually rich page can still be deemed thin if its images or videos are generic, unoriginal, or lack explanatory context, a consideration that is increasingly relevant with the proliferation of AI-generated imagery and video.

A common misconception in SEO circles revolves around word count. While many industry discussions and some tools suggest minimum word counts [22], Google’s John Mueller explicitly stated that there is “no minimum word count” for quality content.[14] This apparent contradiction underscores that “thinness” is a qualitative assessment, not a quantitative one. A brief, concise answer that perfectly satisfies a user’s intent is often superior to a long, rambling article filled with unnecessary information.[2, 23] The concept of “thin” refers to the lack of sufficient value or comprehensiveness for the given query, not simply the number of words. If a complex topic requires thousands of words for a thorough explanation, a 200-word article would indeed be considered thin. Conversely, if a user’s query can be fully and effectively answered in a few sentences, those sentences are not thin. This understanding compels webmasters to prioritize thoroughly addressing the user’s query and demonstrating genuine expertise, rather than pursuing arbitrary word count targets. The thin content label is applied when content is insufficient for its intended purpose, not merely when it is short.

Google Manual Actions: The Human Element in Penalties

A google manual action is a direct intervention by a human reviewer at Google. Unlike automated algorithmic adjustments, a manual action is issued when a Google employee determines that pages on a site are not compliant with Google’s spam policies or webmaster quality guidelines for thin content.[24, 25, 26] Most manual actions are a response to attempts to manipulate Google’s search index.[27]

Manual vs. Algorithmic Penalties: A Key Distinction

It is crucial to differentiate between a google thin content penalty that is a manual action and a ranking drop caused by an algorithmic update. While both can lead to a loss of search rankings, their origins and how they are addressed differ significantly.[28]

This table is valuable because it provides a clear, structured comparison between manual and algorithmic actions, which are often confused. It directly addresses the user’s need to understand the specific nature of a thin content manual action by contrasting it with other types of ranking issues.

How Google Communicates Manual Actions

If a site receives a google thin content penalty or any other manual action, Google is transparent about it. A notification will be sent via email, and the details will be visible in the “Manual Actions” report within Google Search Console.[16, 30, 32] This report specifies the type of issue detected, the affected pages or sections, and often provides examples to help in understanding the problem.[26]

The Gravity and Nuance of Manual Actions

While the immediate impact of a manual action is a dramatic drop in rankings and organic traffic, the long-term implication is a profound loss of Google’s trust and authority.[20, 25] This means that even after the penalty is lifted, regaining previous standing is not automatic and requires rebuilding trust from scratch. This consequence extends beyond mere visibility, affecting the entire brand’s online reputation and perceived credibility. Google’s manual actions are a clear signal of severe policy violations, often indicating a deliberate attempt to manipulate search results. Such behavior fundamentally erodes the trust Google places in a website, impacting its ability to rank for any query, not just those directly related to the thin content. Therefore, recovery from a thin content with little or no added value manual action is not simply a technical cleanup; it demands a fundamental shift in the site’s approach to content creation and a demonstrated, long-term commitment to quality and user value.

It is important to recognize that manual actions are not casual warnings but serious interventions for significant policy breaches. Google’s algorithms are highly effective at detecting spam [24], and manual actions are typically deployed when human reviewers identify violations that are “egregious enough to trigger sanctions” [11], often indicative of aggressive spam techniques or deliberate manipulation.[25, 33] This implies that a thin content with little or no added value manual action is not a minor infraction that slipped past automated systems. Instead, the human review process acts as a crucial safeguard, catching sophisticated or large-scale manipulative tactics that might otherwise evade algorithmic detection. The “little or no added value” component of this manual action is frequently a symptom of this underlying manipulative intent. This understanding should lead webmasters to view manual actions not as an unavoidable part of SEO, but as a clear indication that their practices are fundamentally misaligned with Google’s core mission of providing helpful, reliable search results. Prevention lies in adhering to white-hat SEO principles from the outset, rather than attempting to circumvent guidelines.

The “Thin Content with Little or No Added Value” Manual Action Explained

The thin content with little or no added value manual action is a specific type of penalty issued when Google’s human reviewers find a significant percentage of low-quality or shallow pages on a site that do not provide substantial unique or valuable content to users.[3, 10] This action was notably introduced in 2013.[20]

What Triggers This Specific Manual Action?

This manual action is triggered by the presence of content that Google deems to be of insufficient quality or value. Common triggers include, but are not limited to, the types of thin content discussed earlier: spammy automatically generated content, thin affiliate pages, scraped content, and doorway pages.[10, 34] It can also be triggered by content that is heavy with keywords but makes little sense, or content copied from other sources.[20] Even unintentional duplication, such as an e-commerce site reusing manufacturer product descriptions, can contribute to this issue if done extensively.[20] Additionally, transactional pages or service profiles created solely for SEO purposes without genuine value to the consumer can be flagged.[35]

The Devastating Impact on Search Rankings and Visibility

The consequences of a thin content with little or no added value penalty are severe. Unlike algorithmic adjustments that might cause ranking fluctuations, a manual action can result in a dramatic drop in search rankings or even the complete removal of the affected pages or the entire website from Google’s search results.[13, 20, 25] This leads to a significant loss of organic traffic and can severely damage a brand’s authority and credibility.[36]

“When a website receives a manual action, the affected pages or even the entire website will experience a significant drop in search rankings or may be completely removed from search results. This also leads to a complete loss of organic traffic.” — SEO-Hacker [25]

The “thin” in thin content does not refer to length but to its value. If Google’s algorithms detect duplicated, keyword-stuffed, or high-bounce-rate content, it is likely to be flagged as thin content google.[20]

Scope of the Penalty: Site-wide vs. Partial

A thin content manual action can be applied to specific sections of a website (partial match) or the entire domain (sitewide penalty) if the violation is pervasive.[11, 20] For instance, a large website with tens of thousands of pages might receive a penalty affecting only a subset of its low-quality pages, while a smaller site with a high percentage of thin content might see its entire domain de-indexed.[11]

The Ripple Effect of Thin Content

It is important to understand that the impact of low-value content extends beyond direct manual penalties. Even without a formal thin content manual action, pages with low-value content can be “shadowbanned” or algorithmically de-ranked, leading to a significant lack of search traffic without any explicit notification.[22] This occurs because Google’s systems are constantly evaluating content quality, and a manual action often represents the culmination of persistent low-quality signals. Suboptimal user experience, evidenced by high bounce rates or low dwell time, sends negative signals to Google’s algorithms, resulting in algorithmic de-ranking.[31, 36] A manual action then becomes a more severe, human-imposed consequence for particularly egregious or manipulative cases. This implies that proactive content quality management is essential; waiting for a manual action notification means significant damage has likely already occurred, both algorithmically and to the site’s overall authority. The ultimate goal should be to produce high-quality content that avoids any form of devaluation, not just manual penalties.

Furthermore, the negative impacts of thin content extend far beyond mere search rankings. They encompass weakened brand authority, a negative user experience, and decreased conversion rates.[36] This holistic damage underscores that content quality is not just an SEO technicality but a fundamental business imperative. Poor content leads directly to user dissatisfaction. Dissatisfied users are more likely to bounce from a site, less likely to convert into customers, and less likely to trust the brand. This negative user behavior, in turn, reinforces low-quality signals to Google, exacerbating the ranking drop. Consequently, investing in high-quality, valuable content is not just an SEO tactic; it is a strategic investment in brand building, fostering customer loyalty, and driving sustainable business growth. Avoiding thin content is therefore a critical component of overall digital business health.

Google’s Quality Compass: Webmaster Guidelines and E-E-A-T

To understand why thin content is penalized, one must grasp Google’s overarching philosophy on content quality, encapsulated in its Webmaster Quality Guidelines (now known as Google Search Essentials) and the E-E-A-T framework.

Google’s Webmaster Quality Guidelines: The Foundation

These guidelines outline Google’s official recommendations for website owners to ensure their sites are found, crawled, and indexed effectively.[7] They emphasize that content should be useful and information-rich, written for the end user, and not merely stuffed with keywords for crawlers.[7] Violations of these guidelines are what trigger manual actions, including those for thin content in seo.[25] The guidelines are constantly evolving to meet the latest standards.[7]

E-E-A-T: Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness

E-E-A-T is a crucial framework Google’s quality raters use to assess content quality and credibility.[37, 38] While not a direct ranking factor, it is a mindset for creating helpful, people-centric content that builds trust.[37] The “Experience” element was added in December 2022, emphasizing genuine, first-hand involvement with the topic.[37]

• Experience: Demonstrates first-hand or life experience with the topic. For example, a product review by someone who has actually used and tested the product, or a travel guide by someone who has visited the location.[37] This helps Google differentiate human-created content from AI-generated content.[37]
• Expertise: Reflects the author’s level of knowledge or skill. This can be formal qualifications (e.g., a medical article by a board-certified physician) or everyday proficiency (e.g., an experienced home baker sharing sourdough recipes).[5, 37]
• Authoritativeness: Measures the recognition and reputation of the content creator or website in their field. This is built through citations from reputable sources, positive reviews from industry experts, high-quality backlinks, and awards.[5, 37, 38]
• Trustworthiness: Assesses the accuracy, honesty, safety, and reliability of the content and site. This includes clear attribution of sources, transparency about author backgrounds and biases, regular content updates, secure websites (HTTPS), clear privacy policies, easily accessible contact information, and positive user reviews.[37, 38] This is considered the foundational and most crucial element.[37]

Content that fails to meet these E-E-A-T standards can be considered shallow and contribute to a thin content penalty google.[23] For “Your Money or Your Life” (YMYL) topics, which can significantly impact a person’s health, financial stability, or safety, Google applies an even higher standard of E-E-A-T.[38, 39]

The Role of User Intent in High-Quality Content

Ultimately, what is thin content often boils down to whether it satisfies user intent. Google’s algorithms prioritize content that provides a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic, offering insightful analysis or original information beyond the obvious.[6, 21] If content does not encourage users to stay on the page, Google’s systems, like Navboost, can detect low dwell time, signaling dissatisfaction.[40] As John Mueller, Google’s Search Relations team lead, stated, “If your content does not encourage them to remain with you, they will leave. The search engines can get a sense of this by watching the dwell time.”.[40]

E-E-A-T as a Holistic Quality Signal

The E-E-A-T framework serves as Google’s comprehensive quality signal, guiding both its automated systems and human quality raters. While not a direct ranking factor in the traditional sense, it acts as a foundational benchmark for content credibility.[37, 38] Content that strongly demonstrates Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness naturally becomes more credible in the eyes of both users and search engines. This credibility translates into higher user engagement metrics, such as increased dwell time and lower bounce rates, which are positive signals to Google’s algorithms.[41] The absence of these E-E-A-T signals, or their poor demonstration, can lead to content being perceived as shallow or low-quality, contributing to the “thin” classification. This means that a website’s overall authority and trustworthiness are deeply intertwined with its adherence to E-E-A-T principles, making it a critical consideration for any content strategy aimed at avoiding a thin content penalty.

The interplay of user behavior and algorithmic signals is a crucial aspect of Google’s quality assessment. Google continuously tracks how users interact with search results and content, using metrics like dwell time, click-through rate (CTR), and return-to-search rate.[2, 40, 41, 42] These user signals provide powerful feedback to Google’s algorithms about the usefulness and satisfaction derived from a piece of content. If users quickly return to search results after visiting a page, it indicates that the content did not adequately meet their needs, signaling low quality. This user dissatisfaction directly contributes to the algorithmic de-ranking of thin content, even in the absence of a manual action. This dynamic underscores that Google’s systems are designed to reward content that genuinely serves the user, and any content that fails to do so, regardless of its length or keyword density, is at risk of being deemed thin and losing visibility.

Expert Perspectives on Content Quality

Industry leaders and SEO professionals consistently echo Google’s emphasis on content quality and user value. Their collective wisdom reinforces the principles underlying the thin content with little or no added value manual action.

• Quality Over Quantity: A recurring theme is that quality far outweighs quantity. Rand Fishkin, a prominent SEO expert, stated, “Better content is outweighing more content.”.[43] Similarly, Neil Patel advises, “Create content that teaches. You can’t give up. You need to be consistently awesome.”.[44] This aligns with John Mueller’s assertion that there is “no minimum word count” and that “quality is better than quantity”.[14] The focus should be on providing a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic, offering insightful analysis or original information.[21]

• User-Centricity is Key: The ultimate measure of quality content is its ability to benefit the user. Avinash Kaushik defined it simply: “Content is anything that adds value to the reader’s life.”.[43] Dario Sipos emphasized a critical editing principle: “When you are writing content, remove everything that doesn’t benefit the customer.”.[44] This user-first approach is fundamental to avoiding thin content, as content that fails to meet user expectations will lead to negative user experience signals, such as high bounce rates.[36]

• Content as the Foundation: Many experts highlight content as the backbone of SEO. Lee Odden famously said, “Content is the reason search began in the first place.”.[44] Amit Kalantri added, “The secret of a high-ranking website is not its colours but its content.”.[44] This underscores that even with perfect technical SEO, a site cannot rank well without genuinely valuable content.[43]

Navigating Conflicting Industry Advice

The SEO community sometimes presents conflicting advice, particularly concerning metrics like word count. While some practitioners suggest minimum word counts [22, 42], Google’s official stance from John Mueller is that there is “no minimum word count”.[14, 42] This apparent discrepancy highlights that many industry recommendations are heuristics or best practices derived from observation, rather than strict Google rules. The core message from Google is consistently about value and user satisfaction. A very short piece of content that perfectly answers a direct query is not thin, whereas a long article that rambles or repeats itself can be.[22, 23] This means that webmasters should prioritize the *purpose* and *completeness* of their content for the user, rather than adhering to arbitrary length requirements. The true measure of quality, according to some experts, is how well content performs in terms of user engagement signals like Click-Through Rate (CTR).[42]

This leads to the enduring principle of user value. Despite differing opinions on specific tactics, the consensus among experts and Google’s guidelines is clear: content must provide unique, helpful, and engaging information to its target audience. This principle transcends specific algorithmic updates or manual action types. Content that genuinely benefits the customer, answers their questions comprehensively, and demonstrates expertise will inherently perform better over the long term.[22, 45, 46] Conversely, content that is merely a “keyword dump” or serves no real purpose for the user, even if not explicitly penalized, will struggle to gain visibility and authority.[22] This fundamental understanding is crucial for avoiding the thin content with little or no added value manual action and building a sustainable online presence.

If your website has been impacted by a thin content penalty, it can feel like navigating a complex maze. The path to recovery requires a thorough understanding of Google’s guidelines and a strategic approach to content enhancement. This often involves a deep audit of existing content, identifying pages that lack value, and then either significantly improving them to meet user intent or, in some cases, strategically removing or no-indexing them. The goal is to demonstrate to Google a clear commitment to quality and user satisfaction across your entire domain.

For those facing the daunting challenge of a thin content with little or no added value penalty, expert assistance can be invaluable. A specialized thin content penalty recovery service can provide the necessary expertise to diagnose the root causes, develop a comprehensive remediation plan, and guide you through the reconsideration process with Google. Such services focus not just on lifting the penalty, but on implementing sustainable content strategies that align with Google’s evolving quality standards, ensuring long-term success and preventing future issues.

Conclusion

The thin content with little or no added value manual action represents a significant intervention by Google to maintain the quality and relevance of its search results. It is a direct human-imposed penalty, distinct from algorithmic de-rankings, and is triggered when a human reviewer determines that a substantial portion of a website’s content offers minimal or no unique value to users. This “thinness” is not about word count, but about a lack of substance, originality, and failure to satisfy user intent, often stemming from manipulative SEO practices such as automatically generated content, thin affiliate pages, scraped content, and doorway pages.

The consequences of this manual action are severe, leading to dramatic drops in search rankings, significant loss of organic traffic, and a profound erosion of a website’s trust and authority with Google. Recovery is a rigorous process that requires a fundamental shift towards creating genuinely helpful, people-first content that adheres to Google’s webmaster quality guidelines for thin content and the E-E-A-T framework (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness). This involves demonstrating real-world experience, deep knowledge, industry recognition, and unwavering trustworthiness in all content. Ultimately, avoiding this penalty, and indeed achieving sustainable SEO success, hinges on a proactive commitment to prioritizing the user experience and consistently delivering high-quality, valuable information that perfectly addresses search intent.

Bibliography

• Ahrefs. “What is Auto-Generated Content?” https://ahrefs.com/seo/glossary/auto-generated-content
• Ahrefs. “What is a Doorway Page?” https://ahrefs.com/seo/glossary/doorway-page
• Backlinko. “Google E-E-A-T: How to Create People-First Content (+ Free Audit).” https://backlinko.com/google-e-e-a-t
• Backlinko. “Quality SEO Content: The QRIES Approach for Better Rankings.” https://backlinko.com/quality-seo-content
• Blue Compass. “Common Mistakes That Result In Google Penalties.” https://www.bluecompass.com/blog/common-mistakes-that-result-in-google-penalties
• Bulldog Digital Media. “Famous Google Penalties.” https://bulldogdigitalmedia.co.uk/blog/famous-google-penalties/
• Credible Content. “How does Google Define Quality Content and then Ranks it Accordingly?” https://credible-content.com/blog/quality-content-google-recognize/
• FatRank. “Thin Content With Little or No Added Value.” https://www.fatrank.com/thin-content-with-little-or-no-added-value/
• Feed the Bot. “Scraped Content.” https://www.feedthebot.org/blog/scraped-content/
• Foundery. “What is Thin Content & How to Fix It?” https://foundery.ca/insights/what-is-thin-content-how-to-fix-it/
• Google Search Central Documentation. “Creating Helpful, Reliable, People-First Content.” https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content
• Google Search Central Documentation. “Using generative AI content.” https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/using-gen-ai-content
• Google Search Console Help. “Manual Actions report.” https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9044175?hl=en
• Google Search Console Help. “Getting started with Search Console.” https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/10267942?hl=en
• Google Search Central Community. “Need more information about Google thin content penalty?” https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/119429544/need-more-information-about-google-thin-content-penalty?hl=en
• Google Search Central Community. “Which pages are considered to be thin content for Search Console Manual Action?” https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/212515852/which-pages-are-considered-to-be-thin-content-for-search-console-manual-action?hl=en
• Graffiti9. “Valuable SEO Quotes 2025: By Experts to Boost Your Ranking.” https://www.graffiti9.com/blog/seo-quotes-to-boost-your-ranking/
• GSQI. “Highly Visible and Low Quality (or Unhelpful) – A Most Dangerous SEO Combination.” https://www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/highly-visible-and-low-quality/
• HikeSEO. “Avoid Thin Content.” https://www.hikeseo.co/learn/onsite/avoid-thin-content
• Ignite Visibility. “The Big List of Google Penalties for SEO.” https://ignitevisibility.com/the-big-list-of-google-penalties-for-seo/
• Lumar. “How Google Deals With Thin Content on Websites.” https://www.lumar.io/office-hours/thin-content/
• Mailchimp. “Why Google E‑E‑A‑T Matters for Your Content.” https://mailchimp.com/resources/google-eeat/
• M16 Marketing. “Algorithmic vs. Manual Google Penalties: What’s the Difference?” https://m16marketing.com/digital-marketing-blog/algorithmic-vs-manual-google-penalties-whats-the-difference/
• Morningscore. “What is thin content in SEO, and how to fix it?” https://morningscore.io/what-is-thin-content/
• O8 Agency. “Google Helpful Content Update: Improve Your SEO.” https://www.o8.agency/blog/marketing-strategy/google-helpful-content-update-improve-your-seo
• OutreachZ. “What Does a Dramatic Drop in Google Rankings Mean?” https://outreachz.com/blog/google-ranking-dropped-dramatically/
• Positional. “Thin Content.” https://www.positional.com/blog/thin-content
• Proof3. “Google’s Helpful Content: What it is & Why it’s Important for SEO.” https://proof3.co/insights/googles-helpful-content-what-it-is-why-its-important-for-seo
• Radd Interactive. “What is Thin Content? Understand Google’s Thin Content Penalty SEO.” https://raddinteractive.com/what-is-thin-content-understand-googles-thin-content-penalty-seo/
• Reddit. “Is thin seo content better than nothing?” https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1jubecz/is_thin_seo_content_better_than_nothing/
• Reddit. “What is quality content for google?” https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1bek8w7/what_is_quality_content_for_google/
• Ryte Wiki. “Manual Actions.” https://en.ryte.com/wiki/Manual_Actions/
• Search Atlas. “Thin Content: What It Is and How to Identify & Fix It.” https://searchatlas.com/blog/thin-content/
• Search Engine Land. “Google penalties, manual actions and notifications: A complete.” https://searchengineland.com/google-penalties-manual-actions-notifications-guide-388509
• Search Engine Land. “Content search engine ranking.” https://searchengineland.com/guide/seo/content-search-engine-ranking
• SEMrush. “Google penalties.” https://www.semrush.com/blog/google-penalty/
• SEO-Hacker. “Google Manual Actions Guide.” https://seo-hacker.com/google-manual-actions-guide/
• SEOPress. “Dealing With a Manual Action from Google.” https://www.seopress.org/newsroom/featured-stories/dealing-with-a-manual-action-from-google/
• SEOZoom. “Google’s manual actions: what they are and how to correct them.” https://www.seozoom.com/google-manual-actions/
• SHE Media. “What is Low Value Content?” https://support.shemedia.com/hc/en-us/articles/19621344318107-What-is-Low-Value-Content
• Suso Digital. “Thin Content Google Manual Penalty.” https://susodigital.com/blog/thin-content-google-manual-penalty
• The SEM Post. “Understanding Google Panda: Definitive Algo Guide for SEOs.” http://www.thesempost.com/understanding-google-panda-definitive-algo-guide-for-seos/
• The 7 Eagles. “Thin Content.” https://the7eagles.com/thin-content/
• Vazoola. “Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines Explained.” https://www.vazoola.com/resources/googles-new-quality-raters-guideline
• WebFX. “What is Thin Content?” https://www.webfx.com/blog/seo/thin-content/
• Wikipedia. “Doorway page.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doorway_page
• Wolf of SEO. “What are Webmaster Guidelines?” https://wolf-of-seo.de/en/what-is/webmaster-guidelines/